donderdag 9 september 2010
Pénurie d'infirmier(e)s: tout est question de mauvaise répartition
15 propositions pour l'emploi des jeunes et des seniors
Le taux d’emploi des jeunes comme celui des seniors reste trop faible. Cette concentration de l’activité économique n’est pas tenable : elle pèse sur la croissance et fragilise la solidarité entre les générations.
woensdag 8 september 2010
Ondernemerschap, een motor voor jobcreatie? Een oefening in het kader van de Vlaamse Arbeidsrekening
Waarom worden vacatures moeilijk ingevuld?
Number of the Week: Safer Banks Without Sacrificing Growth
Paying Third-Graders for Better Test Scores
Read the complete article on the WSJ Economics blog here.
Le ministre Nollet renforce l'aide au logement
A Small Step in the Right Direction
"The Obama administration is now proposing that businesses be allowed to expense investment expenditures. That is, for purposes of calculating taxable income, businesses would be able to fully and immediately deduct the cost of equipment, rather than having to gradually deduct the cost via depreciation allowances.
This is a good idea. People are feeling poorer and more uncertain about the future. The rational response is greater saving. The trick to restoring aggregate demand and full employment is to channel that saving into investment. Normally, the Fed can help by lowering interest rates. But with interest rates at the zero lower bound, that option is not available. Tax incentives for investment can help achieve what monetary policy would if it could.
However, the impact will be relatively modest. Notice that expensing merely accelerates deductions. Thus, the value to the firm depends on interest rates. With interest rates near zero, the impetus to investment is small. Put another way, this policy can be seen as giving firms a zero-interest loan if they invest in equipment. But with interest rates near zero anyway, the value of the loan is not that great.
One can imagine more aggressive policies along similar lines, such as an investment tax credit together with expensing. But let's not make the best the enemy of the good. This policy proposal is a step in the right direction. I hope Congress passes it quickly and in a bipartisan fashion."
Nombre record de familles endettées
Mieux prévenir. Puis punir ?
dinsdag 7 september 2010
De sociale gelaagdheid van schoolse achterstand in GOK en niet-GOK scholen
Hierbij wordt gebruik gemaakt van data die verzameld werden in het kader van de Vlaamse survey “Gezinnen, Zorg en Opvang”, vertrekkend van een representatief staal van gezinnen met kinderen. Het oplopen van schoolachterstand in het Vlaams basisonderwijs is een zeer sterk sociaal gelaagd fenomeen. Er wordt ook vastgesteld dat de GOK-scholen minder dan verwacht verschillen van niet-GOK-scholen inzake het sociaal profiel en het welbevinden van hun leerlingen. Verder tonen de analyses ook aan dat het verband tussen sociale achtergrond en schoolse achterstand niet consequent sterker is in GOK-scholen dan in niet-GOK-scholen. Er zijn indicaties dat deze bevindingen minstens voor een deel verband houden met de criteria die gebruikt worden om de GOK-middelen toe te wijzen.
Recession geopolitics
Feeding the NHS, Starving Its Patients
This article appeared in the Wall Street Journal of September 1st:
The latest indictment of Britain's single-payer health care.
Postcard from the National Health Service: In 2007, 239 patients died of malnutrition in British hospitals, the latest year for which figures are available. Age U.K., a charity that has campaigned to improve hospital feedings, says the "true figure may be much higher" due to under-reporting.
This latest indictment of British health care is nothing new; Age U.K.'s efforts have yielded results in terms of increased government awareness, screening, training, and inspection programs. But this flurry of activity has produced little by way of improvement. Monday's report noted that in 2007-2008, 148,946 Britons entered hospitals suffering from malnutrition and 157,175 left in that state, meaning that hospitals released 8,229 people worse-off nutritionally than when they entered. In 2008-2009, that worse-off figure was up to 10,443.
The problem is not insufficient food. Hospital malnutrition mostly affects the elderly or otherwise frail, who often need individualized mealtime assistance. Balanced against everything else that a nurse might be doing, spoon-feeding the elderly may not seem like the best use of time or resources, but for some it may literally be a matter of life and death. Yet the constant scarcities created by socialized medicine, along with the never-ending drive to cut costs, has led the NHS to give nurses additional responsibilities and powers in recent years. Inevitably, this leaves them with less time to make sure patients are getting fed.
Prime Minister David Cameron's new government was quick to remind Britons on Monday that these appalling outcomes reflect more than a decade of Labour rule. But an official also stressed that "local NHS trusts are responsible for developing their own nutritional care policies." The subtext is that you can't blame Westminster for local bureaucrats' failings. This excuse doesn't quite square with the government's strategy to improve British health, which boils down to more power and autonomy for local health providers and authorities. In any case, this is not a Labour problem or a Tory problem. It's a single-payer health-care problem.
Localizing decision-making can only accomplish so much when the local deciders have no control over their budgets. Allocations for local health budgets are made in London, using a single formula that factors in populations and local health-care needs. No matter how much latitude Mr. Cameron or Health Secretary Andrew Lansley grant local authorities and medical providers, they will never be truly free to focus on individuals' needs as long as they answer to politicians rather than patients.
Along with their promises of decentralization, Messrs. Cameron and Lansley are also upholding the one constant in British politics: to increase health spending, and thus to mitigate the horrors of inevitable rationing. But in a single-payer system, is any pot of money ever big enough? The NHS's budget doubled under Labour between 1997 and 2007—largesse that nonetheless brought us to Monday's dismal statistic. Can anyone still seriously believe that additional funding or a new organizational chart can prevent another discussion on starving patients in English hospitals, or worse, in a few years' time?
France: Retraites : ce que prévoit le projet de loi
Tax Cuts That Make a Difference
In Europe, Fund-Raising Lessons From Americans
La pension, pas la pression !
Kernergie van de toekomst
Nouveau "flop" des bons d’Etat
La mixité sociale, vecteur de réussite ?
maandag 6 september 2010
Niet-werkende ouders grootste rem leerlingen
Do not fall for talk of European solvency
“Low for long” policy rates: Risky but needed to keep the global financial system in balance
Départ accru de seniors
Parents au chômage, les résultats scolaires chuttent
vrijdag 3 september 2010
Killing the cure
Biodiversity is essential for the functioning of the ecosystems that sustain all life on Earth, and its ongoing and escalating disappearance will harm society in myriad ways. But one way that is overlooked is the damaging impact on medical science.... Read the complete article on Project Syndicate here.