dinsdag 7 september 2010
De sociale gelaagdheid van schoolse achterstand in GOK en niet-GOK scholen
Hierbij wordt gebruik gemaakt van data die verzameld werden in het kader van de Vlaamse survey “Gezinnen, Zorg en Opvang”, vertrekkend van een representatief staal van gezinnen met kinderen. Het oplopen van schoolachterstand in het Vlaams basisonderwijs is een zeer sterk sociaal gelaagd fenomeen. Er wordt ook vastgesteld dat de GOK-scholen minder dan verwacht verschillen van niet-GOK-scholen inzake het sociaal profiel en het welbevinden van hun leerlingen. Verder tonen de analyses ook aan dat het verband tussen sociale achtergrond en schoolse achterstand niet consequent sterker is in GOK-scholen dan in niet-GOK-scholen. Er zijn indicaties dat deze bevindingen minstens voor een deel verband houden met de criteria die gebruikt worden om de GOK-middelen toe te wijzen.
Recession geopolitics
Feeding the NHS, Starving Its Patients
This article appeared in the Wall Street Journal of September 1st:
The latest indictment of Britain's single-payer health care.
Postcard from the National Health Service: In 2007, 239 patients died of malnutrition in British hospitals, the latest year for which figures are available. Age U.K., a charity that has campaigned to improve hospital feedings, says the "true figure may be much higher" due to under-reporting.
This latest indictment of British health care is nothing new; Age U.K.'s efforts have yielded results in terms of increased government awareness, screening, training, and inspection programs. But this flurry of activity has produced little by way of improvement. Monday's report noted that in 2007-2008, 148,946 Britons entered hospitals suffering from malnutrition and 157,175 left in that state, meaning that hospitals released 8,229 people worse-off nutritionally than when they entered. In 2008-2009, that worse-off figure was up to 10,443.
The problem is not insufficient food. Hospital malnutrition mostly affects the elderly or otherwise frail, who often need individualized mealtime assistance. Balanced against everything else that a nurse might be doing, spoon-feeding the elderly may not seem like the best use of time or resources, but for some it may literally be a matter of life and death. Yet the constant scarcities created by socialized medicine, along with the never-ending drive to cut costs, has led the NHS to give nurses additional responsibilities and powers in recent years. Inevitably, this leaves them with less time to make sure patients are getting fed.
Prime Minister David Cameron's new government was quick to remind Britons on Monday that these appalling outcomes reflect more than a decade of Labour rule. But an official also stressed that "local NHS trusts are responsible for developing their own nutritional care policies." The subtext is that you can't blame Westminster for local bureaucrats' failings. This excuse doesn't quite square with the government's strategy to improve British health, which boils down to more power and autonomy for local health providers and authorities. In any case, this is not a Labour problem or a Tory problem. It's a single-payer health-care problem.
Localizing decision-making can only accomplish so much when the local deciders have no control over their budgets. Allocations for local health budgets are made in London, using a single formula that factors in populations and local health-care needs. No matter how much latitude Mr. Cameron or Health Secretary Andrew Lansley grant local authorities and medical providers, they will never be truly free to focus on individuals' needs as long as they answer to politicians rather than patients.
Along with their promises of decentralization, Messrs. Cameron and Lansley are also upholding the one constant in British politics: to increase health spending, and thus to mitigate the horrors of inevitable rationing. But in a single-payer system, is any pot of money ever big enough? The NHS's budget doubled under Labour between 1997 and 2007—largesse that nonetheless brought us to Monday's dismal statistic. Can anyone still seriously believe that additional funding or a new organizational chart can prevent another discussion on starving patients in English hospitals, or worse, in a few years' time?
France: Retraites : ce que prévoit le projet de loi
Tax Cuts That Make a Difference
In Europe, Fund-Raising Lessons From Americans
La pension, pas la pression !
Kernergie van de toekomst
Nouveau "flop" des bons d’Etat
La mixité sociale, vecteur de réussite ?
maandag 6 september 2010
Niet-werkende ouders grootste rem leerlingen
Do not fall for talk of European solvency
“Low for long” policy rates: Risky but needed to keep the global financial system in balance
Départ accru de seniors
Parents au chômage, les résultats scolaires chuttent
vrijdag 3 september 2010
Killing the cure
Biodiversity is essential for the functioning of the ecosystems that sustain all life on Earth, and its ongoing and escalating disappearance will harm society in myriad ways. But one way that is overlooked is the damaging impact on medical science.... Read the complete article on Project Syndicate here.
Intellectual-property battles: Patent lather
Global economic policy: Monetary illusions
Central bankers are not magicians. Don’t count on them to conjure up remedies if the rich economies flag. Read the complete article in The Economist here.
The Folly of Subsidizing Unemployment
Liegen over Brussel
L'UE crée quatre autorités de supervision financière
Fiscal space
Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy
Les Belges puisent plus dans leurs fonds propres pour acheter une habitation
La Belgique à la diète en 2011 ?
donderdag 2 september 2010
Plan d'économies record pour l’Allemagne
Impôt : la centralisation continue malgré le fédéralisme
Ambiguity is another reason to mitigate climate change
N’ayons pas peur !
L'assurance maladie peut économiser 2 milliards
Les banques rapportent 700 millions d'euros
Lisez cet article dans LLB ici.
woensdag 1 september 2010
Bruxelles-Capitale: Cinq impasses, une issue
flamande et française de Belgique, mais aussi – et chaque jour davantage - de l’Union
européenne? Comment la gouvernance de Bruxelles peut-elle prendre en compte comme il
convient les intérêts de tous les Bruxellois, qu’ils soient francophones ou néerlandophones,
«nouveaux Belges» ou «Européens», en harmonie avec la Flandre et la Wallonie, les deux
régions voisines avec lesquelles Bruxelles entretient des liens étroits? Avant d’explorer les
scénarios d’avenir, jetons un coup d’oeil sur la physionomie actuelle de la ville et de ses
habitants. Lisez l'article complet de Philippe Van Parys, professeur à l'UCL, la KUL et Harvard, ici.
De grijze hersencelletjes slijpen
The Varieties of Unemployment
Formula to Grade Teachers’ Skill Gains in Use, and Critics
Pensioenzorgen
Een nieuwe regering, in welke samenstelling ook, krijgt onvermijdelijk weer het pensioendossier op haar bord. Lees de volledige column van Patrick Martens in Knack hier.